Azurah wrote:I haven't run any modules. For some reason, I prefer to come up with my own tangled plots. My favorite highlight so far, though, was the run-away walking tower on chicken legs in the Outlands. ;) If you've read the last page of the Player's Primer to the Outlands, you know what I'm talking about. But anyway, we've done more than enough to write a book. I should. :P
In my opinion, he didn't have a grasp on the whole flavor of Sigil, and the atmosphere was completely off. It felt more like Ravenloft.
I'm dying to play in a good campaign, though. Have room in yours? ;}
GraysonAC wrote:I've been running one for a few months now, although it's a 3.5 game (Don't shoot!).
Doug Williams wrote:GraysonAC wrote:I've been running one for a few months now, although it's a 3.5 game (Don't shoot!). Has WoTC translated Planescape over to v. 3.0/3.5 yet?
Azurah wrote:Part of me is sad to hear that, and yet... a larger part of me is relieved.Holy crap, Winterwords, your sig made me laugh so hard. :lol:
Azurah wrote:That's the spirit! Throw your party into the Hells for a fun little romp! :DI don't have much experience at all with 1E. Would it be overly difficult to incorporate the setting, or at least the flavor of it, into a 1E campaign?
Azurah wrote:If you're taking them on a trip into hell, I'd say the meat would more be the atmosphere than the rules, anyhow. So I think what you did with the Ravenloft campaign would be a great idea, especially if you're introducing players to new elements. Sounds neat. :) Bug me for tips anytime. I don't mind. In fact, can I play, too? ;}
solomani wrote:Doug Williams wrote:Has WoTC translated Planescape over to v. 3.0/3.5 yet?Actually PS was one of the settings that made no money. So they wont be brining it back anytime soon. But they did give a group of enthusiasts a free license to convert to 3.5 and add their own content.Welcome to Planewalker | Planewalker
Doug Williams wrote:Has WoTC translated Planescape over to v. 3.0/3.5 yet?