The Acaeum Dungeons & Dragons
Collecting Forums

weird ebay rule
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
Author

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2589
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Last Visit: Mar 11, 2023
Location: Seattle, WA

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:27 pm 
 

I was looking up something else in ebay's policies and noticed this odd item...







Allowed:



Delivery Confirmation and extra services: If these options are offered to the buyer, you can only charge what they actually cost. Examples of services include:



           Certificate of Mailing

           Certified Mail

           Collect on Delivery

           Delivery Confirmation

           Registered Mail

           Restricted Delivery

           Return Receipt

           Signature Confirmation

           Special Handling





Not allowed:



Insurance: Sellers aren't allowed to charge a separate fee for insurance, although they still need to make sure their item arrives as described.



Tip: You should incorporate any insurance fees into an item's price or handling cost.





reference:  http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/sel ... l#shipping





What kind of messed up logic is that?  I could force everyone to pay for signature confirmation, but not to buy insurance?  I'm supposed to calculate insurance ahead of time and incorporate that cost... but the cost is variable based on the insured value.



I don't usually jump on the ebay bashing threads, but this is just crazy!

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 6172
Joined: May 03, 2003
Last Visit: Feb 10, 2026
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:48 pm 
 

That is a strange one.  Last time I checked, Ebay still had a spot on their invoice to offer the option of insurance to a buyer for an additional fee.

Also, even though their recommendation is to put it into the starting price of the auction. they also still state it is a valid "handling expense":

Handling cost: This can include the cost of packaging materials and insurance cost, if any.

Not really very surprising that Ebay has inconsistencies within their policy.

 WWW  

User avatar

Prolific Collector

Posts: 415
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Last Visit: Jun 04, 2026

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:55 pm 
 

Regarding insurance: It's pointless, in general. USPS offers it because it's profit for them. The rates are too high, and I doubt the claim procedure is a walk in the park.

For 99% of my eBay transactions, I'm better off eating the cost of the occasional (in my experience: rare) lost or damage package. I don't want it as a buyer, and I don't want it as a seller.

Do the math. Multiply the minimum insurance cost ($1.75) by the number of successful transactions you've had as a buyer or seller. The calculate the value of lost/damage packages. If the former is higher than the latter, then insurance is a bad idea for you.


Guy Fullerton
Chaotic Henchmen Productions
http://www.chaotichenchmen.com/

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 6172
Joined: May 03, 2003
Last Visit: Feb 10, 2026
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:59 pm 
 

I'm with Guy on that front.  The one time I paid for insurance and received a damaged item, the seller was absolutely no help and the post office wasn't either.

I shipped back a bad laptop the other day by UPS and they asked if I wanted insurance.  Their rate was $4.50 per $100 so to insure the $1500 machine would have been almost $70.

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:56 pm 
 

In the UK you are no longer permitted to offer optional insurance. Under PayPal rules the seller is obliged to fully insure and send all items recorded delivery, or assume all responsibility and risk for not doing so. I believe this is the same now in the US.

In my opinion this is exactly how it should be. The buyer should never have to assume any risk in a purchase at all. If the seller decides to take the risks themselves or pay for insurance and recorded delivery, and if he decides to pass those costs on to the buyer or suffer them himself, is entirely a matter for him.

Both eBay and PayPal are united and absolutely clear on these matters. The seller has absolute responsibility to ensure the buyer receives his purchase safely and securely and in the condition in which it was sold. All they are doing in their policy is explaining that as a seller you can't take the piss and proffit from shipping and handling charges.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2589
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Last Visit: Mar 11, 2023
Location: Seattle, WA

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:12 pm 
 

I agree that the seller is responsible to get the item delivered safely.  The buyer pays, that's it.


I guess I'm just trying to understand why the buyer shouldn't have to pay for insurance.  They pay for shipping.  It's okay for them to pay for services (some of which are far more expensive than simple insurance - registered mail, anyone?).  But having the buyer for the insurance is out.  That's weird.


I also agree with Guy, but I like insurance on expensive items for a different reason.  I feel like it creates one more barrier to "you never sent it" / "I never received it."  With just delivery confirmation, it's only Paypal/Ebay policy backing you up.  But if there is an insurance claim involved, it better be real, otherwise there is the potential for postal fraud.  Severe legal penalties tend to stomp out idiots' false claims instantly.

Is it a severe problem?  No.  And, statistically, I'm sure it's still better to eat that rare loss.  But I just can't let a liar win.  :)  So when I buy or sell above a certain level (generally $100) I tend to opt for insurance.

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3718
Joined: May 30, 2007
Last Visit: Aug 04, 2026
Location: USA Georgia

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:09 pm 
 

I require Registered Mail for International shipments of non-gaming items (gamers are more honest than average), and Registered Mail comes with free insurance (about $45.00 or so).  So, whenever an international buyer starts asking where their shipment is, I simply state that international shipments take three weeks to a month and that if they haven't received their shipment by then that I'll report the problem to the Postal and Insurance authorities.  I've never had a problem, even though the Post Office "authorities" are a joke (read: virtually non-existent).  8)


Truth is worth finding and life is too short to work for money.

  

User avatar

Prolific Collector

Posts: 683
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
Last Visit: Jun 03, 2020
Location: Bedford, TX

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:31 pm 
 

Just remember, insurance protects the SELLER not the buyer.

Sellers always make the buyer pay for insurance and when I buy something over $100 I always request the price with insurance to ship it, but it doesn't protect me as the buyer one bit.

If an item arrives in any other condition than the listed/sod condition, I can file a complaint and get my money back .. no questions... so who's out the money without insurance - seller

If the item never arrives, again I can file a complaint and get my money back, and who's out out the money without insurance - seller

And who HAS to file the insurance claim - seller (because they actually made the purchase of the insurance, not the buyer)

So insurance, tough mostly paid for by the buyer, only protects the seller...

I ALWAYS include insurance for all transactions, especially over $100 and thus require a signature by default.

 WWW  


Verbose Collector

Posts: 1709
Joined: Sep 03, 2003
Last Visit: Feb 24, 2026
Location: Portown

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:51 pm 
 

TheHistorian wrote:I guess I'm just trying to understand why the buyer shouldn't have to pay for insurance.  They pay for shipping.  It's okay for them to pay for services (some of which are far more expensive than simple insurance - registered mail, anyone?).  But having the buyer for the insurance is out.  That's weird.


You can still charge the buyer for insurance. It just can't be optional. You have to either include it in the total shipping charge, or not charge for it. Previously, if you required insurance I believe the Ebay shipping calculator would calculate insurance based on the price of the item and include it in the total shipping charge the buyer would see (I'm thinking of BIN auctions here, not sure how regular auctions work). I'm not sure if this still works.

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:52 pm 
 

Yeah, eBay are trying to say that you can charge for insurance and you can provide it as you see fit, but you have to place it in your shipping and handling fee. What used to happen before was sellers would offer 'optional insurance' at an extra charge and then when something went wrong say, "You didn't pay for optional insurance to fuck you!" EBay have moved away from this means of trying to screw buyers by placing the entire responsibility and risk onto the seller. Whether the seller wants to pay for it or not, and whether he wants to charge for it or not, is entirely his choice. What he cannot do is pass the decision and responsibility back to the buyer.

I just say in my auctions, 'All packages will be fully insured and shipped recorded delivery.' It is a requirement of PayPal's Seller Protection Policy anyway. Buyers always have the option to buy from a cheaper seller, and one who won't insure or track shipments, and that's entirely their choice.

In the grand scheme of things the market will balance itself out anyways. I'd be willing to bet in five years we're all listing things with 'free shipping' and just bundling shipping, insurance, packaging and handling, into the BINs. EBay are making a big effort to move away from an auction model to a retail model, and anything that is S&H is something they don't get their 20% cut on. They'll be stamping that out.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  


Long-Winded Collector

Posts: 3549
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Last Visit: May 16, 2026
Location: Wandering aimlessly on the 8th level down...

Post Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:39 am 
 

Ah, so that would explain their current stance, in the UK at least, to reduce fees on free postage items.
I guess that ultimately increases the sale price as there then isn't a postage tag on to up it...
However, it is still considerably cheaper to buy new blu-rays, dvds, games and books from Amazon. Makes me laugh, the idiots who buy from ebay when its cheaper elsewhere!


Rolls a '3'

"Did I hit.....?"

  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Jul 09, 2026

Post Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:53 am 
 

Makes me laugh, the idiots who buy from ebay when its cheaper elsewhere!


Makes me laugh, the idiots who think everything can be found on eBay.


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  


Long-Winded Collector

Posts: 3549
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Last Visit: May 16, 2026
Location: Wandering aimlessly on the 8th level down...

Post Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:18 am 
 

serleran wrote:
Makes me laugh, the idiots who think everything can be found on eBay.


:lol:


Rolls a '3'

"Did I hit.....?"

  
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 1