Kingofpain89 wrote:Palace of the Vampire Queen (3rd or 4th print?): ** expired/removed eBay auction **
Mars wrote:I wouldn't say that the Tome of Treasures exactle legitimizes these copies:http://tomeoftreasures.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3965
mbassoc2003 wrote:I wonder if he could confirm the legitimacy of the 3rd print, and who he gave permission to manufacture them to?
mbassoc2003 wrote:No. What I meant was, we don't actively 'out' the photocopying of legitimate items. Be that photocopying them yesterday, last year or a decade ago. They are not exactly legitimate products.Now I accept that with tourneys and fanzines, that was the accepted means of doing things, and certainly the only economic way of a lot of things getting printed in the early 80's. But there is a difference between a xeroxed book bound and stapled that was always a xeroxed book bound and stapled, and a photocopy of an otherwise legitimate product.These 3rd print PoVQs were hawked around conventions for the best part of a decade, and sold as copies of an otherwise unavailable product. But with the comming of the internet, all of a sudden they are a fabled 3rd printing which is bollocks. And I'm not saying these are the product of any one individual. Indeed, Mr Zocchi went so far as to put his name on the ones he had manufactured. But they were certainly photocopied here in the UK also, and probably in a dozen other games shops accross the US.And if they are 'legitimate real printings' than what's happened to the orange cover PoVQ from Mathias' old site. It must surely be the rarest of all PoVQs. A photocopy with a simple typed cover spiral bound.IMO, the third print is a photocopy spree that ran rampage through the US and the UK. None of them are real. I do recall Pete Kerestan visiting this site in the dim and distant past. I wonder if he could confirm the legitimacy of the 3rd print, and who he gave permission to manufacture them to?But without any real proof that these photocopies are real PoVQ's they are fakes. They may be 10 year old fakes, but a fake is a fake.
Mars wrote:I think it is safe to say that copies were produced later on but the big question is if they were produced with permission - this would at least legitimize them. Also, finding out when they were produced would be useful. Lou might be the better one to talk to?
Aneoth wrote:Glad I read this thread.
Blackmoor wrote:Mars wrote:I wouldn't say that the Tome of Treasures exactle legitimizes these copies:http://tomeoftreasures.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3965I agree, ToT looks like it was trying to get to the bottom of it.
mbassoc2003 wrote:If ever there were a time for Kynan to revisit, now would be it. His expertise in this matter are probably unparalleled.
Rakeesh sah Tarna wrote:^^ reads like changed mind already
mbassoc2003 wrote:And there's no way in hell WW had their own worldwide distribution deals.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Either way, there's no way of telling the vast majority of fakes from the few remaining vaguely legitimate copies. Anyone can print a Zocchi label if you were gonna use the Zocchie label as the 'hey look it must be real'.
Rakeesh sah Tarna wrote:do you know anyone with copy bought later to compare + are you sure did not have zocchi label that other copy from edinburgh did have
mbassoc2003 wrote:And the community online is shite too
mbassoc2003 wrote:There is an Edinburgh sorced copy of PoVQ with a Zocchi label on it, known to the community!? No, I don't know of any
Rakeesh sah Tarna wrote:you can see LZ as supplier for back in stock potvq in those wds now??
Rakeesh sah Tarna wrote:that one on tfm thread http://tomeoftreasures.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1843 was sold from edinburgh fwiw
mbassoc2003 wrote:Rakeesh sah Tarna wrote:you can see LZ as supplier for back in stock potvq in those wds now??Maybe in the early to mid '80s.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Not plausable IMO for LZ to have supplied the stock that was available at con's in the late '80s and early '90s.