sauromatian wrote:My son just bought the current D&D Basic Game with his birthday money. He already has the previous edition, but is getting into the game more-&-more so I didn't discourage him. He mostly wanted the figures.Surprise, surprise. There are no cards with the figures, & the stats provided are oversimplified to the point of being worthless in a real minis or RPG game; plus each figure's stats are buried within the text of the exceedingly lame, scripted scenario. He's so disappointed, he didn't even bother to open the plastic pack of figures, not even the Blue Dragon he's talked about wanting for months. From a practical standpoint, the usefulness of the figures is compromised. WotC has PDFs of the cards on their site -but of only one side, will be less convenient to use, & they won't turn out well on my cheap printer.From a kids' point of view, it's a little more emotional. News flash, WotC: kids collect cards. They obsess over the coolness of special toys. Now he just might put the game aside like so many other faded interests.All for what? To satisfy some corporate efficiency expert over 15 cents worth of cardboard (the booster versions of the cards were already in production, so 15 cents is probably an exaggeration), or some marketing consultant who thought they were confusing if included.Worst of all, in the previous Basic Game the cards were a stepping-stone to the minis game & RPG, so in the long term WotC shoots themselves in the foot. Sixteen cards don't seem like such a big deal in the long run, but their conspicuous absence shows that the publishers have lost their grip. D&D really has become nothing but a very minor asset to a faceless [or in any event careless] giant consumer products conglomerate. It's an indicator of what we can expect from now on: D&D that's about as solid as the Transformers constructible game.
deimos3428 wrote: However, the rest of your post mostly flew over my head.
There's a Basic game, a Minis game, and the regular RPG now?
deimos3428 wrote:However, the rest of your post mostly flew over my head.
bombadil wrote:Prob'ly the coug thread.
smarmy1 wrote:Thanks again, Bclarkie .... I was hoping you would come out of retirement now and again for the good fight. By the way, many of us are very appreciative for the thankless work you do.
chalk_outline wrote:Hey bclarkie dickhole, I'm just checking out the posts, don't drag me into your holy war!