benjoshua wrote in Shrinkwrap legitimacy.:Welcome brikke! You have come to the right place! While I have limited experience with shrink wrap, I have run into re-shrinked items, and this is disappointing. It's also an underhanded way of making an item look like it's worth more than it really is. This topic has been discussed before, but I can't remember a thorough how-to thread. I think part of the problem is that different legitimate shrink wrap technologies and varieties have been used in the past. It would be nice if D&D products that were shrinkwrapped could be grouped according to the type of shrink that might be found and what to look for in each case. That would take significant time and effort.If you have a particular item needing evaluation, simply post a picture or two, and that'll likely get a quicker answer.Again, welcome!
dbartman wrote in Shrinkwrap legitimacy.:As always, shrinkwrap is NOT a condition...
dbartman wrote in Shrinkwrap legitimacy.:There have been many conversations on SW over the years. Here are some that might be of interest:ShrinkHow to spot original shrink-wrap vs. fake...Spotting re-shrinked items?Shrink Wrap validation inquiry and FGU CitadelRecent prices for AD&D-D&D items in SW on EbayAs always, shrinkwrap is NOT a condition...
Tszii wrote in Shrinkwrap legitimacy.:The earliest mono shrink is loose, wrinkled and may bunch loosely ends. It stays flexible, like cling wrap that doesn't cling. 1978 or so.