MetamorphosisSigma wrote:I'll defer to other's greater familiarity with the current occupations and interests of such early module writers as Hammack, Carr, Schick, Morris, and Niles, but I personally would love to see something from any of them.
Munafik wrote:I was wondering if anyone on these boards ever considered commissioning a new module to be written by one of TSR's Golden Age designers? I know that many on these boards have contact information for some of these designers of old. I feel that a new module from Allen Hammack, Lawrence Shick, Harold Johnson, Graeme Morris, Jim Bramba, Mike Carr, Douglas Niles, or perhaps Paul Jaquays would be fantastic. The module could be written under the OSRIC or Labyrinth Lord licenses so as to allow it to be as close to the 1st Edition AD&D or Basic D&D rules, respectively, as legally possible. Perhaps you could organize the commissioned module as was done with the new Erol Otus print. Unfortunately, being as my discretionary income is in short supply these days, I personally couldn't financially contribute, but I feel that many of the serious collectors on this website with deeper pockets would be interested in organizing such an endeavor. Thanks for reading, Alphonso Warden
bbarsh wrote:Lastly, is this really a good idea? I know someone brought up the L4 thing. I really don't want to see that again.
TheHistorian wrote:The problem with L4 is that it had a shifting cast of parties involved with editing, cleanup, etc. That led to delays and an ultimately disappointing product. Fault of the writer? Probably not.
Badmike wrote:That is yet another item you would have to deal with upon hiring the Golden Age Great to write up or publish a new module.Mike B.
FormCritic wrote:The real fault with L4 was the unreasonably high level expectations by the online RPG crowd. People have no idea how hard it is to produce any published work.L4 is a labor of love by people who volunteered their time...and it is free.If L4 had been produced by a game company with an intent to sell, I could understand the vitriol. As it is, people should enjoy what they got for what it is
TheHistorian wrote:Whether it's free or not, if the end product has errors, then it's fair to call them out. Of course, one can't be cheated by a free item, but expressing disappointment that something could be better is fair.I was the sole proofreader/editor for Castle Of The Mad Archmage, a work somewhat larger than L4. I offer no opinion on the quality of the material, think what you like, but I am CERTAIN that we achieved better overall editing and internal consistency. I volunteered my time, and was given a small thank you by the author at the end of the project (more than a cup of coffee, less than a decent meal). So quality material can be produced, and offered without the intent of making a profit.
FormCriticThe real fault with L4 was the unreasonably high level expectations by the online RPG crowd.
People have no idea how hard it is to produce any published work.