SoulCatcher78 wrote:As long as it's not a repack of their other starter set: http://www.amazon.com/Dungeons-Dragons- ... 0786948205That thing was an abortion in a box.It does sound like they've used some of the same design ideas though (cardboard counters, battle mat,and size of the books). I wonder what speed they plan on rolling out the other levels.
JasonZavoda wrote:A few notes.Quick scan of the players and DMs books.This is freaking scam. The big boxed set covers levels 1 and 2 in an extremely abbreviated form. You create characters in only the most general way with very few options in regard to armor, weapons, spells, etc... It seems like a glossy but dumbed down kind of Hero Quest.And that is another thing. This appears to be a miniatures game. I am hoping it will be a fun miniatures game, but it seems to be about as much of an RPG as Hero Quest.Now the reason I say it is a scam is a look at the cover. Classic D&D cover art, red box, should be all you need to start a real D&D RPG campaign, and from what I have seen it is nothing like that at all. Instead any semblance of an actual rulebook is in the next release. This is just a demo box rather than the basic game rules that it resembles.Anyway, tried to redemption code and couldn't even find where to enter it in. The website DungeonandDragons.com/code just takes you to the Wotc D&D home page. if anyone has a link to where you can use the redemption code please let me know.
misterspock wrote:Why is that old starter set $80-$200 on Amazon?http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/ ... dition=new
SoulCatcher78 wrote:lol, go Amazon sellers I did find some information about the rest of the line that's hitting this year. Some of it seems like a pretty good idea (the tile set for instance).http://critical-hits.com/2010/07/20/a-d ... essentials
4e has changed a lot over the past two years. The mechanical design we see in later books is quite different from the design we see in the early releases....The one thing keeping players sane is the Character Builder. Because it's constantly updated, we don't have to worry too much about keeping up with all of the updates. Of course, it makes us look at our core rulebooks and wonder why we bother to carry them around. I know I've stopped doing so. I might as well be bringing a Laurell K. Hamilton hardback for all the good they'd do me at the table...While current players have the character builder to keep them updated, DM's don't have it as easy. Unlike the Character Builder with it's continued updates, WOTC never actually updated the original monsters with the updated math we find in the Monster Manual 3. Our first Monster Manual is pretty useless above level 10 and there's no other way to update the monsters within other than to do it ourselves.
Is it D&D 4.5? Not really. Because it's still "fully compatible" with all of the stuff this far, and it is for the most part, it isn't an entirely new addition.Whether you're as excited about this as I am or angry about what this might mean for D&D, we'll all be watching for the release and what it might do to the game we love.
SoulCatcher78 wrote:lol, go Amazon sellers I did find some information about the rest of the line that's hitting this year. Some of it seems like a pretty good idea (the tile set for instance).http://critical-hits.com/2010/07/20/a-d ... ssentials/4E might not be the thing for everyone but at least they are trying to attract new players with a low(er) cost starter (which is expandable, unlike previous starter sets from WOTC).
JasonZavoda wrote:If the essentials set isn't 4.5 edition then why the next set of books. This red box only handles levels 1 and 2, but the next item they want you to buy takes characters to level 30. Isn't that what the core rulebooks are suppossed to do? This box set is a demo, not a game system. All it does is showcase a few character classes and a handful of abilities. Then try to get you to buy another 1/2 dozen rulebooks. If this is 4e then why would anyone who owns the core rulebooks put their money into more core rulebooks (unless they contain different information?) Or is this an attempt at a different rulesystem?I just can't see what Wotc is trying to do except to make more money in the short term by selling core rulebooks all over again.
Crimsonspire wrote:I went to the ACD Game Day, and according to Wizards at their seminar, the style of the box and the true purpose of it is to get the "lapsed" players from the 80s. I feel it's going to backfire, anyone who has played back then and stopped will most likely be turned off from what they get from it.
FormCritic wrote:And...here is the funniest line from the link above:You can ignore this and keep playing with the stuff you have. D&D is still D&D regardless of whether you play with the original un-errata'd Players Handbook or the entire set of D&D Essentials.OR, using the same logic, you could ignore it all and keep playing 3.5.