FormCritic wrote:No doubt the '85 Bears would have put up a valiant struggle. The '85 Bears enjoyed a perfect storm season. The Patriots making the Super Bowl to get squished was typical of the breaks that went the Bears' way. A fluke victory over the Raiders put the Patriots in position to get embarrassed.The '85 Bears did not face a team with the offensive power of the 1990's Cowboys teams. The '85 Bears were a weak offensive team that relied on turnovers and defensive pressure to keep them in games. Of course, it is possible that the Cowboys might have blown the game on turnovers. (That's what the Cowboys did against the 49ers in one NFC championship game during that great era. That's why Steve Young got a Super Bowl win.)If the two teams played seven times I call it 5-2 in favor of the Cowboys...and that's being generous to the Bears.That was an entire era during which the real Super Bowl was the NFC Championship game.
Invincible Overlord wrote:Agreed. The NFC Championship game was the real Super Bowl back then...However, I still hold to the fact that the '85 Bears would beat the '92 Cowboys strictly on their defense alone. When they won the coin toss for the Super Bowl game, they chose to put their defense on the field first. Name one other team in Super Bowl history that chose to do that.That and Payton up the middle, Payton down the left, Payton down the right... Anyone know of any simulation programs that could put teams from various years against each other?
Badmike wrote:Crazy first round of the draft, having it all by itself on Thursday is stupid, but oh well..Lots of draft day surprises. The Cowboys Dez Bryant pick blew me out of my socks. Wow, they finally take a1st round WR (after Michael Irvin in 1988) and get an stud and not a reach. Awesome.Mike B.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Agree with Mike on this one.Bryant will not be a bust.FAR too much talent in those hands and legs for that to happen.Yes, the guy is obviously a disipline problem, but so was Irvin... and TO... and Moss... and Marshall, as well as many other star WRs.And like some of the names above, Bryant fell in the draft almost completely based on those perceived problems.Otherwise he would have gone in the top 5... easily.I think the Cowboys got a great deal with that pick.IMO It was one of the best value picks in the entire draft.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Yes, the guy is obviously a disipline problem, but so was Irvin... and TO... and Moss... and Marshall, as well as many other star WRs.
FormCritic wrote:Difference between Irvin and the others....Irvin played his career for one team because he did not become such an ego problem that he was hurting the team effort.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:True to some extent. But some ego aside, his off the field antics and legal troubles inluded many things.Which did (all too often) draw very negative press to the team overall and especially to him.
FormCritic wrote:It might be possible to have sympathy for these guys. Consider...a guy like TO has been a star since junior high. He went to college as a priviledged mercenary and he has never held a job in his adult life. His looks and money have insulated him from the need to develop real adult relationships........except that a number of young men with similar cultural and social backgrounds go through the same experience and yet still become mature adults. The concentration of emotional midgets at the wide receiver position is striking. It is more striking when compared with...say...offensive linemen. Since there are a lot more offensive linemen than wide recievers, we would expect more jerks. The opposite is true.
Invincible Overlord wrote:Offensive linemen don't generally have the capacity to make more than a million dollars a year, or multi-year 15 million dollar contracts. I think that has a lot to do with the offensive linemen being (no pun intended) better grounded than wide receivers.