killjoy32 wrote:gives julian lennon something to do i guess ....Al
Badmike wrote:"I always liked his music. He only made two mistakes, he took drugs and married the ugliest woman on earth."Mike B.
gyg wrote:apologies again,but I opened Pandoras box --"What do you call a dog with wings?"
gyg wrote:close, but no cigar (To put you out of your potential misery - that would be Linda Mccartney)
misterspock wrote:Then I think your question should've been phrased, "what do you call a three-legged dog with wings?"
gyg wrote::D oh dear - perhaps I'll draw the curtain on this sorry subject.(Beatles are before my time, and I can,t say they do anything for me I'm afraid - The Stones though, that's a different matter (and they're almost all still alive - which probably comes as something of a shock to themselves )
stratochamp wrote: the stones should have quit in 1974 when mick taylor did. they have done nothing of any lasting consequence since that date. in my opinion. having said that, they are no worse than 4th in a listing of the best rock bands 1)beatles 2)zeppelin 3)who 4)stones. feel free to flip the last two if you think that the richards/townsend comparison somehow outweighs the moon-entwistle/watts-wyman rhythm section.
Badmike wrote: they should have made 1981 their farewell tour .. I feel the same about Bowie....he's an absolute genius but everything after "Let's Dance" is completely forgettable.
Kingofpain89 wrote:Happy Thanksgiving you hosers!