Phaedran wrote:I have to say I'm a bit surprised at the amount of people bowing out because they don't like the art. The look of it is certainly classic Erol Otus and I'm assuming everyone who wanted one is familiar with his style.I'm just wondering what it is that people don't like. Is it the look of it or the actual content of the picture? Was there ever a discussion on the boards as to what the picture should or shouldn't look like or was it left up to the artist?To be clear, I'm not faulting anyone for not liking it. There is plenty of art out there that I don't care for either. I just think the response is interesting.
Kingofpain89 wrote:I don't have a clue what's going on with the fighter type in the middle but it looks damn cool.
Kingofpain89 wrote:It is certainly classic Erol Otus style...no denying that. If you read back through the beginning of the thread, there were a few comments about what some people envisioned the piece would look like and what they would like to see....but in the end I believe that it would be left up to the artist. I will admit, it isn't anything like I thought it would be. But with the exception of a couple of small things, I really like it. I don't have a clue what's going on with the fighter type in the middle but it looks damn cool. And is it just my imagination or does the tower in the background have the word "Acaeum" on it?
PaulKM wrote:The art was left completely up to Erol, save for the inclusion of the site's name.