Gus Landt wrote:It is an elitist endeavor
Kingofpain89 wrote:Funniest thing I have read all day.
Gus Landt wrote:Was it? It isn't when "Community" is being defined as "50 people who didn't happen to have too busy of a few days to check the boards"This most definitely is NOT a community endeavor. It is an elitist endeavor for a lucky handful. That is all well & good, but don't call it what it isn't.
bclarkie wrote:My God, some people around here need to lighten up. Honestly, you'll live.
TheMilford wrote:How so?Not that there is anything wrong with being elite... it is however appropriate use of the word.
bclarkie wrote:this thing isn't "elitist" enough.
TheMilford wrote:fair enough.
Kingofpain89 wrote: They are just trying to do something that would benefit the whole group and it spiralled into this godforsaken mess.
bclarkie wrote:...just in case that wasn't clear in my post.
TheMilford wrote:No, they are not. If that were the case the deserving members on the wait list would have been added to the main list... it's that simple.
Kingofpain89 wrote:"Deserving"....curious you keep using that word. Sounds like something an elitist would use.And I am not the only person here that thinks you are simply "mildly disappointed". Someone who is only mildly disappointed doesnt use a sentence like "But I know EO is most special to me... I would really like to see the right thing done here." If you were only "mildly dissapointed" as you put it, you would have stopped posting about it already.
bclarkie wrote: Don't take me wrong, I understand some people are upset that they are not in line at this point to get it, but continually complaining about it isn't helping either though. It is what it is.
cheesepaws wrote:I think this exemplifies part of the problem pretty well. A "suck it up" response rather than a genuine attempt to offer up a solution is the kind of flippant attitude that erodes the "community".
cheesepaws wrote: Regardless of who is on or not on the list -- that there is such an obvious concern for fair play* should not be marginalized or belittled as whining. A community cares for ALL of its members. Where are the solutions that go beyond "too bad?"
cheesepaws wrote:I hate to bring up the "L" word again but it sure does seem to me that a lottery is still the way to go. But do it right. Continue to build a list of folks interested and prepared to pay.
cheesepaws wrote:Finish the negotiations with Otus and outline the specifics of the printing and mailing. SHOW THE COMMUNITY THE ORIGINAL ART -- only then….after a set number of days and a firm and well announced deadline - pick the lucky 50.
cheesepaws wrote:** Maybe everybody doesn't win in this scenario -- but the community does. I know a lottery has been mentioned before, but I don't think I have read a response from the committee (or anyone actually) as to why it is a bad idea.(?)
gyg wrote:In case it comes down to the first 20 - I call dibs now