Jaybird216 wrote:That all being said, I'd like to withdraw my reservation (lucky you, davidc!). I'm a fan of Otus' work, but not a rabid fan.
deimos3428 wrote:Please bump me to the bottom of the waiting list, and shift everyone up by one. I am not backing down on my commitment to this project, and will continue to underwrite one copy, so if by some absurdity another 6-7 people drop off "copy #50" is still covered.
Aneoth wrote:Here is another idea and along the same lines as you folks are talking....Why not make availability for the First copy of the 50 prints go to the person with the MOST posts on this Forum, then the member with the next most posts gets number two, then so on until the 50 prints are gone.That way only those who contribute the most get a print.The rest of us are just outa luck.Of course then Foul would be outa luck too and he is the reason this forum exists.
Aneoth wrote:The rest of us are just outa luck.
bclarkie wrote: I fail to see how acting deliberately obtuse is helping at all.
Jaybird216 wrote:That's what a community is for.
bombadil wrote:The altruism's getting a little thick around here...
Gus Landt wrote:Wow, it never even occurred to me how easy it would have been for someone to create a couple new accounts the day this was posted so they could get multiple copies. That would be insanely easy to do, just using a second email address and the mailing address of a family member.The only thing I have to contribute is this - it seems to me that the number "50" wasn't picked because it was magical, but because it seemed like a large enough number to meet the needs of this community. I would guess that whomever picked the number "50" did so partially wondering if all 50 would be accounted for. Obviously that has not been the case, so why force it to stick to an original guess? What is gained by that? Clearly this project is more popular than originally estimated, and now we have some information to make a more accurate estimate. Making a single correction to the print run is not opening the door to continued revising. It is simply correcting an initial guess that turned out to be too low.To whomever picked the number "50" - if you had known in the beginning that the copies would have sold so quickly, and that we would so quickly be looking at a 20 name waiting list, would you have gone with 75 or even 100?Up the number to 100, pay EO $2500 for the prints, and another $2500 for the original. Give the original to Foul as a gift for creating this place for all of us. Or, put that extra cash towards a future book of all the prints created out of this project.
bombadil wrote:Who's to say the individuals that signed on to the Acaeum aren't going to be the next generation of long-term and active posters that bring new blood to the hobbies of collecting and gaming? Maybe this was the stochastic event that brought them over the threshold into the community.
bombadil wrote:And to paraphrase (Dawkins, IIRC): Acts of altruism often, upon closer examination, reveal themselves to be acts of selfishness in disguise.
Aneoth wrote:Obtuse?Thanks so much for the insult.That was much more helpful.....
bbarsh wrote:print # should be assigned in alphabetical order with the exception of Aneoth