SimperingToad wrote:if people received residuals, then pulling the line of PDFs and releasing 'new' versions would remove the ties to old authors.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:EIGHTY FREAKING BUCKS for a brand new copy of a rehashed T1?!?!
Gnat the Beggar wrote:I already have a copy of T1 on my self (Actually a few of em). And I did not have to pay $40, or $80 for it either. In fact IIRC I did not even pay a TENTH of the lower end of that range. OK, a collector might pay upwards of $40 for a Mint SWed First Print (Mono) of T1 these days, but not $80.
Badmike wrote:I agree this has started to become ludicrous. I'd love ONE SINGLE original idea to pop out of WOTC's ass anytime soon. I love nostalgia as much or more than the next guy, but I'm sorry, coming out with 4E verisions of Village of Hommlet, Against the Giants, Descent Into the Depths, Tomb of Horors, or whatever corpse they decide to unearth this week just tells me they aren't even trying. Especially with the burgeoning retro-clone movement and several quality releases by the independent operator (Just reading F1 Fane of Poisoned Prophecies by Guy Fullerton and he's got the look and feel down perfectly without making a fool of himself).Mike B.
ExTSR wrote:::snort:: The PoG made sure that nobody got any royalties or residuals from anything. Not even Gary or Dave iirc.F
SoulCatcher78 wrote:I'm holding judgement on that until I see their Giants adventure that's coming out this summer.
SoulCatcher78 wrote:I found the RPGA thread for the Hommlet roll out here. For those of you currently signed up for the RPGA (and GM rewards program) you might be getting a suprise in the mail. If you are a member and haven't updated your information lately you can do so and look to be a part of the August mailing. According to the high muckety muck of the RPGA (WotC_Tulach) this should be pretty painless (see post #13 in the thread).If anyone needs an RPGA sign up card, I still have a couple (4) and can mail them out if you're interested in signing up.Additional RPGA Rewards information
bbarsh wrote:Why is it that in order to lend any sort of credibility to any version of D&D they need to rehash a classic. For some reason there seems to be a mentality that good scenario (ala the classics) is beneath them.
Xaxaxe wrote:I've already received a couple of requests to post a review, or maybe just a broad overview, when I get my copy, so I'll be sure to do that. I've paid the guy and his solid feedback would seem to indicate a reliable shipper, so I hope to have it soon-ish.
Knightfall wrote:I'm not a 4e fan, but I'm hoping Revenge of the Giants has a good deal of fluff in it. If it's all 4e rules crunch then I'll probably skip it.
SoulCatcher78 wrote:If anyone needs an RPGA sign up card, I still have a couple (4) and can mail them out if you're interested in signing up.
grodog wrote:More importantly: why don't they have anyone with the design chops to produce a 4e "classic" that's equivalent to T1?
Invincible Overlord wrote:As far as the re-release of old modules to newer formats... if the module was that good when it was released, why not re-release it for a newer audience?
grodog wrote:Interesting: a 160 page boxed set for $40 @ GenCon (August release). I guess I'll be interested to see what it's about, although I can't imagine many stores having non-shrink copies to dig into :/
..........designed for paragon-level characters...........
Gnat the Beggar wrote:I do not even know what that means.