Deadlord39 wrote:I believe the main reason we all detest 3/4E is the fact that they call it Dungeons and Dragons and bill it as a roleplaying game. It clearly is neither.
deimos3428 wrote:More relevant to the Acaeum, when will 4E be collectible?
deimos3428 wrote:I'm betting never. How do you prove you have an "original" digital copy of something? And it's all in Mint condition, or it doesn't work at all. So no matter what they end of doing to the rules, it will suck.
deimos3428 wrote:More relevant to the Acaeum, when will 4E be collectible? I'm betting never. How do you prove you have an "original" digital copy of something? And it's all in Mint condition, or it doesn't work at all. So no matter what they end of doing to the rules, it will suck.
sauromatian wrote:... but not much else did until the internet began to pull collectors together in the mid-90s.
Xaxaxe wrote:But the old-school stuff was almost guaranteed to become collectible for the same reason that first-generation stuff became collectible in other niche hobbies: the original adapters — the kids, in other words — needed to become adults with disposable income.
Plaag wrote:Well I wouldn't put to much stock in any WotC books being valuable for a long long time, the print runs are huge. Smaller companies would be where the 4e items that could become valuable are likely to come from. I'd say even with 3.x that holds true. Any WotC released D&D book valuable now?ShaneG.
killjoy32 wrote:just spotted this...http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35799