The Acaeum Dungeons & Dragons
Collecting Forums

4th Edition Collecting
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 3 of 612, 3, 456
Author

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5885
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Jul 31, 2026
Location: Cow Hampshire, US

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:22 pm 
 

That's hilarious. We have a BOX of them that the Netgear rep gave us. Gotta be 80 brains in there. Now I have to head down to Marketing and get a few.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

  


Active Collector

Posts: 60
Joined: Nov 07, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 11, 2025

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:18 pm 
 

Given how easy it ought to be to make a kick-ass cover for a monster book, it's surprising how bad all those are. 3.0 is acceptable and AD&D1 is charming if not outstanding; the rest, well, there were kids at my high school who could have done better.

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 123
Joined: Oct 06, 2005
Last Visit: May 22, 2017
Location: Cleveland, OH

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:26 pm 
 

improvstone wrote:
Is it just me? Am I becoming old and stuck in my ways?  :scratch:

I liked the 1e books....  To me this was a golden age for D&D art.  I know a lot of you started with the earlier artwork. But I felt Elmore, Parkinson, Caldwell etc brought alot to the game.

There is also something about the quality of the paper books vs the newer glossy books.  I know the paper books age and yellow but still they just feel better when searching for things.  And no I don't want to read the book online.  I spend enough time as a developer killing my eyes in front of a screen as it is ....  PDT_Armataz_01_12


What bothers me is that the price is so high compared to the value of the content, and I'm sure that having color printing ON EVERY PAGE contributes to that. I'd much rather have less slick-looking books for a lower price.


"We were put on this Earth to fart around."
                            - Kurt Vonnegut

  


Verbose Collector

Posts: 1324
Joined: May 28, 2007
Last Visit: Aug 27, 2011
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:27 pm 
 

Technically, this one should be in instead of the black border one that's up there:

Image

And let's not forget this one either:

Image

  


Verbose Collector

Posts: 1324
Joined: May 28, 2007
Last Visit: Aug 27, 2011
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:32 pm 
 

silver_beetle wrote:What bothers me is that the price is so high compared to the value of the content, and I'm sure that having color printing ON EVERY PAGE contributes to that. I'd much rather have less slick-looking books for a lower price.


It's not WotC, but I wish I could find the thread over on RPG.net where a Steve Jackson Games employee explained the rationale behind the majority of the GURPS Fourth sourcebooks being hardcover with colour pages vs. the softcover B&W format that GURPS 3rd's supplements were in.  It pretty much amounted to: "It's what the majority of players surveyed claimed they'd rather have."

Does make it much harder on the wallet though. :(

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Sep 30, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:46 pm 
 

Deadlord:

IF you're gonna go snag some Gleemax brains, how about snagging a couple for me?

Mark


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Sep 30, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:47 pm 
 

I liked the cover art on the 3.5 Monster Manual the best....although 1st edition is the champion for nostaligic, old-school feel.

I am reserving judgement on 4.0 until I see the rules.


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Jul 09, 2026

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:02 pm 
 

Deadlord:

IF you're gonna go snag some Gleemax brains, how about snagging a couple for me?


Me, three? :)


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  


Sage Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 2884
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Last Visit: May 09, 2020

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:04 pm 
 

I'm seeing a Gleemax brain as the perfect gift for my eight-month-old. He destroys all he comes into contact with.

(Me, four, in other words?)

 WWW  

User avatar

Verbose Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 1123
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Last Visit: Jul 10, 2026
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:04 pm 
 

Xaxaxe wrote:I'm seeing a Gleemax brain as the perfect gift for my eight-month-old. He destroys all he comes into contact with.

(Me, four, in other words?)


Great we all have Gleemax on the brain now ... ok me 5 .. I have a dog that likes to chew things ...  maybe we should have a photo competition?  The best photo showing the destruction of a gleemax brain.


"... and may I remind you that this ain't the end. I can still kick some ass." - Tom Petty

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2332
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Last Visit: Aug 27, 2017
Location: Shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods

Post Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:56 pm 
 

improvstone wrote:Great we all have Gleemax on the brain now ... ok me 5

Was Deadlord posting about Gleemax-branded brains or Netgear-branded brains?

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5885
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Jul 31, 2026
Location: Cow Hampshire, US

Post Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:04 pm 
 

They're Netgears, IIRC. I'll grab as many as I can. The Marketing chick bears a striking resemblance to a Formorian giant, so all I need to do is smile at her and she'll cave in. Or kill me with a club.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

  

User avatar

Verbose Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 1123
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Last Visit: Jul 10, 2026
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:32 pm 
 

Deadlord39 wrote: Or kill me with a club.


Nah ... she'll just knock you out and drag you back to her cave.  Then you really are in trouble  :wink:


"... and may I remind you that this ain't the end. I can still kick some ass." - Tom Petty

 WWW  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
JG Valuation Board

Posts: 3823
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Last Visit: Dec 17, 2021

Post Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:47 pm 
 

FormCritic wrote:I liked the cover art on the 3.5 Monster Manual the best....although 1st edition is the champion for nostaligic, old-school feel.

I am reserving judgement on 4.0 until I see the rules.


I'll climb out on a limb and say that 4.0 will suck.

RPGs were games of the imagination. They weren't about slick looks or slick rules, they were about the magic and wonder that pure creativity inspires.

No artists can ever capture the richness and detail of anyone's imagination. They grab a small fragment of the artist's own vision, what they can put down on canvas or on paper or on a computer screen, but a fantasy game can open up an unparalled world, unique and alive, and take the players from around a dinner table and have them walk in that world, fight and laugh and die in that world.

Every edition of AD&D/D&D steps further from that raw source of imagination. More numbers, more rules, more power, but less imagination. Less ease for those who want to stray off the mapboard and out of the rulebook.

RPGs are hard games to run well, but it isn't a matter of rules, new or improved or otherwise. It is a matter of inspriation, and the thought of a 4th edition only inspires me to take out my old game notes and RPGs from twenty or thirty years ago, not shell out money for a slick new hardcover.

Your game experience may vary.

  


Sage Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 2884
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Last Visit: May 09, 2020

Post Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:45 am 
 

JasonZavoda wrote:I'll climb out on a limb and say that 4.0 will suck.

That is going to be one crowded limb ... I hope it doesn't break on us.  :)

4.0 will suck hard. It will be an event horizon from which fun itself cannot escape. You summed up many of the reasons why in your post, so I'll just say, "Good post; I agree."

The suits at Wizards have done me one big favor, though. My complete lack of interest in their latest nonsense has helped to rekindle my interest in ODD/1e, which had been somewhat on the wane this summer.

So ... uh ... thanks, suits!

 WWW  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 159
Joined: Mar 20, 2006
Last Visit: Mar 07, 2025
Location: Cape Coral Florida

Post Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:02 pm 
 

One good thing 4E will do is create another temporary upsurge in RPG sales and add a new burst to the industry. That's good news for someone like me who does freelance art on these books and looks forward to times when the companies are actively hiring again.
On a side note, Xaxaxe, what was the original source of your avatar? I love recreations and parodies of classic D&D art.

 WWW  


Sage Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 2884
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Last Visit: May 09, 2020

Post Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:06 pm 
 

kevin mayle wrote:On a side note, Xaxaxe, what was the original source of your avatar? I love recreations and parodies of classic D&D art.

That's the blue book cover (obviously), using the characters from the Order of the Stick web-comic. And the characters are even playing their "correct" roles, too (the archer is firing arrows, the wizard is prepping spells, etc.).

The Order of the Stick can be found here:

http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0482.html

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8283
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 26, 2025
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:32 pm 
 

well i picked up a gleemax brain thing at gencon....does that count as a 4E collectable?

:)

Al


Are we nearly there yet?

  
PreviousNext
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 3 of 612, 3, 456