improvstone wrote:Is it just me? Am I becoming old and stuck in my ways? I liked the 1e books.... To me this was a golden age for D&D art. I know a lot of you started with the earlier artwork. But I felt Elmore, Parkinson, Caldwell etc brought alot to the game.There is also something about the quality of the paper books vs the newer glossy books. I know the paper books age and yellow but still they just feel better when searching for things. And no I don't want to read the book online. I spend enough time as a developer killing my eyes in front of a screen as it is ....
silver_beetle wrote:What bothers me is that the price is so high compared to the value of the content, and I'm sure that having color printing ON EVERY PAGE contributes to that. I'd much rather have less slick-looking books for a lower price.
Deadlord:IF you're gonna go snag some Gleemax brains, how about snagging a couple for me?
Xaxaxe wrote:I'm seeing a Gleemax brain as the perfect gift for my eight-month-old. He destroys all he comes into contact with.(Me, four, in other words?)
improvstone wrote:Great we all have Gleemax on the brain now ... ok me 5
Deadlord39 wrote: Or kill me with a club.
FormCritic wrote:I liked the cover art on the 3.5 Monster Manual the best....although 1st edition is the champion for nostaligic, old-school feel.I am reserving judgement on 4.0 until I see the rules.
JasonZavoda wrote:I'll climb out on a limb and say that 4.0 will suck.
kevin mayle wrote:On a side note, Xaxaxe, what was the original source of your avatar? I love recreations and parodies of classic D&D art.