Zenfinite wrote:Dragonborn are kinda like lizard men, but with more dragon than lizard (or man for that matter). They get to breathe acid, cold, or fire once an encounter. It's really only good for wiping out minions, and letting themselves get hung out to dry hehe.Eladrin are basically really elvish elves. It doesn't make sense until you read up on "normal" elves. The standard elf seems to be more of a woodland wild elf type, while the Eladrin are the more high-and-mighty holier-than-thou elves. They split the elf archetype into two separate beings, essentially.Tieflings are easy, humans with a touch of devil in them. Think Constantine, the movie, sort of like that. Not necessarily evil, but, just a hint of devil.Warlocks are the sorceror port over from 3.5, while wizards are normal wizards. They basically area control combat. Warlords are sort of combat tacticians, kind of a fighter/bard oddity. They can do things like inspire comrades to extra attacks...............Zenfinite
Agent Cooper wrote:BADMIKE: You mentioned how you wish somebody would license 1e out. Actually they did, to Kenzer and Company, who made Hackmaster. I've never played it and I don't know much about it. It seems to be basically 1e rules repackaged under a new name with kind of a humorous slant to it.It would be nice to see some 1e stuff come out again. I think it would sell better than people think. Didn't Goodman Games put out some new mods in 1e not too long ago?
Okay, so, Kenzer doesn't own 1e? I thought they bought it from Wizards?
Who really owns it now?
Why don't they let it out under an open gaming license?
Does 4th Ed operate under an OGL?
serleran wrote:No, Kenzer never "owned" 1e. They had a deal to produce material but had to follow certain, specific, guidelines - a license does not mean ownership. It means "you can do this, if we say you can." I believe they got this deal due to the Dragon Archive fiasco, but I am unsure.
Agent Cooper wrote:If 4e has no Grapple rules, that alone could be a deal maker.
Xaxaxe wrote:Seriously ... see what I mean? An improved index — or, better yet — an actual glossary would have been a nice touch. This was a bad fumble by WotC.Don't worry; I'm leaving now. I wouldn't want to, you know, actually mention 4e on a thread that is labeled "4e." That would clearly be inappropriate.
Agent Cooper wrote:Zen- Just out of curiosity, is that "Grab" an opposed check type thing? How does it work?
deimos3428 wrote:Actually, the people that have read the books and/or played the game should stop posting. This is the "What do YOU think 4E will be like" thread
Xaxaxe wrote: He's earned the right not to have to read such babble.