MetamorphosisSigma wrote:From a collecting standpoint, I personally would think anyone who owns a legitimate copy of this should be pissed, as it seems to me these replicas would lower the value of the real deal by their availability. Someone will sneak one past WotC on eBay eventually.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:As for Wotco getting one snuck by them on e-Bay?Do you REALLY think it was Wotco who reported to e-Bay and demanded that my listing be removed?REALLY?Seriously?
Badmike wrote:That's an old disproven argument.
We had some on these boards screaming bloody murder when WOTC released PDFs of the original White Box way back when, saying these would "devalue" their original. #1, it didn't happen, #2, who the fuck cares, seriously.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Last thing was death by Aliens, Aliens: Allan GroheMarines, etc. the rest of us suckers...First time I ever played.There were at least two things I learned:ONE: The Queen is REALLY hard to killTWO: This game really aint geared for the Marines to win, or even to survive for that matter
Chainsaw wrote:Great Aliens board and figs, grodog. I hope you bring it again next year.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Sure you can Allan.I can e-mail them to you as well.
lucyjoyce wrote:Doug - Sorry if this has been listed elsewhere, but I want to determine the print run of some of the digest books. I know you said in the NTRPG Con forum that the limit on any LE digest book would be 100. And I believe you stated that Dennis Sustare's "Tourist Traps" had a print run of 50, with permission to print another 25.For "Onto the Devil's Skillet" (Tim Kask), "Snakeriders of the Aradondo" (Tim Kask), and the "The Dark Abbot of KOS" (Steve Winter), were 100 copies printed? Thanks!
mbassoc2003 wrote:I do acknowledge that there may be a slight impact occasionally in someome's decision to buy or make do with an illegal PDF when it comes to current publications, but as far as OOP publications go, there is plenty of evidence that there is no tangible impact on value of the originals, and no evidence at all that anyone is financially impacted.
The moral issue is whether it is acceptable for an individual to profit from illegally using someone elses IP. Not whether in doing so they are financially harmed. Is it morally acceptable to create a limited edition item, something of inherent value that will appreciate in value, based on illegally using someone elses work?
And if that were not the intent, and this were purely a 'research' project, then why not make the product available to all comers instead of a select few?
FormCritic wrote:I imagine we're the only people in the teacup who care about this little tempest.
mbassoc2003 wrote:I'm wondering if I should start marketting PDFs without approval from the copyright holders. It seems as though the forum's moral standing has moved in favour of this sort of activity, and I have a nice set of the the big five Role Aids tourneys I've been trying to get Mayfair to give me permission to release for years.I suspect people would part with £10 for a well presented set of Role Aids tourneys, and it's not like the PDFs would impact on anyone who has the originals.In fact, maybe this sort of thing would drum up interest in the collecting of the rare non-TSR collectables.