The Acaeum Dungeons & Dragons
Collecting Forums

The Noble Knight Dragon #1 Conundrum
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 2 of 21, 2
Author

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
JG Valuation Board

Posts: 3823
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Last Visit: Dec 17, 2021

Post Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 6:07 pm 
 

Part of retail pricing is what the replacement cost will be. If NK figures that it is going to cost $200 - $300 just to replace the Dragon #1 they are not likely to consider selling it for that price. Collectors tend to sell for the current value, usually a low value as they are motivated to sell quickly. A retailer that doesn't need to liquadate an attractive and valuable item isn't likely to sell something at the replacement cost. I think having a wide variety of expensive collectables generates more talk about NK for much less money than an aggressive advertising campaign would cost.


"You get more with a kind word and an excruciator than with just a kind word."

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector

Posts: 3153
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Last Visit: Feb 05, 2016
Location: UK

Post Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 9:00 pm 
 

muaddib5 wrote in The Noble Knight Dragon #1 Conundrum:
** expired/removed eBay auction **

nm... ;)

(just please don't assign the final price to "VF" condition on the valuation tables? *jk*)


"7.3 ORGANIZING THE PARTY: Always have a keg, even if it's BYOB...
7.4 TAKING THE GAME SERIOUSLY: Don't"

  

User avatar

Sage Collector
Valuation Board

Posts: 2867
Joined: Nov 16, 2002
Last Visit: Aug 06, 2026
Location: Ohio, The land without sun

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 12:12 am 
 

Wow, NK effect...  Directly quoting their $900 price.

That's the problem with BIN, Best Offer, and even single-bid sales.  They often don't represent normal sale prices.  This one won't find it's way to the valuations.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5885
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Jul 31, 2026
Location: Cow Hampshire, US

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 12:18 pm 
 

muaddib5 wrote in The Noble Knight Dragon #1 Conundrum:
I'm not sure "VERY good businessman" is the first term that comes to mind when most think of NK  :roll:

Whatever floats your boat I guess, like the BIN listing for Dragon #2 at $395 that was just posted.  Out of 96,887 listings, the first 10 pages are items at or above $195.00.  

To me, this sounds more like the hedge fund manager who raised the $13.50 per pill medication to $750.00 per pill overnight than a "shrewd" business stragety.  But that's just me.

Thanks,
muaddib5


I didn't say a SCRUPULOUS one, Mu. The best ones rarely are.
That hedge fund manager you mentioned was a guru. He raised his price with the full intention of dropping it; he know Harvoni was on the horizon. The intent was never to get $750 per pill; it was to get a gigantic amount of free publicity (bad works just fine in finance) to get people to hop the train. The result? Harvoni now goes for $1,300 a pill; hep C patients being treated have almost tripled; and since a huge number of patients are on Medicare the taxpayer foots the bill, to the point where the government is scrambling (Medicare is barred from negotiating drug prices). For all anyone knows, the makers of Sovaldi and Harvoni cooked up this path together years ago. It happens every single day.
SO much goes on behind the scenes in drugs and finance that a lot of times it makes no sense on the surface. These guys get paid millions for a reason. They don't care if the world sees them as the Antichrist, their job is to make money for their company and shareholders.
Now, I personally don't care what anyone other collector/reseller charges. That is up to them. If they want to artificially drive up the market by taking a risk, se la vie. That is capitalism. Then again, I have no dog in this fight, so it is easy for me to take that stance. NK is in the game to make money; as long as he doesn't cheat or steal I don't see why he shouldn't be allowed to charge whatever he likes. Time has proven that you will get a $450 Dragonfish (my term, patented as of today) on occasion, and retailers are OK with sitting on high value items for long periods. Much of the time that is just eye candy for their low value sales.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector

Posts: 3153
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Last Visit: Feb 05, 2016
Location: UK

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:03 pm 
 

muaddib5 wrote in The Noble Knight Dragon #1 Conundrum:I'm not sure "VERY good businessman" is the first term that comes to mind when most think of NK  :roll:

Perhaps not so good a "businessman" in the other direction before he changed his pricing strategy on the rares? i.e. Back when he casually listed a SW'd oB3 for $995, careless to eBay prices climbing rapidly up towards the $3,000+ record sale. :)

JasonZavoda wrote in The Noble Knight Dragon #1 Conundrum:I think having a wide variety of expensive collectables generates more talk about NK for much less money than an aggressive advertising campaign would cost.

Yes, Aaron has said as much; that some of the higher priced items are to grab attention rather than just purely "there for sales", or words to that effect. (And even if they are sold, obtaining replacement copies isn't a trivial matter for a good number of those).


"7.3 ORGANIZING THE PARTY: Always have a keg, even if it's BYOB...
7.4 TAKING THE GAME SERIOUSLY: Don't"

  
Previous
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 2 of 21, 2