The Acaeum Dungeons & Dragons
Collecting Forums

Greyhawk folio vs. boxed set -- maps question
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 2 of 21, 2
Author

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5885
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Jul 31, 2026
Location: Cow Hampshire, US

Post Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 10:58 pm 
 

I have several Greyhawk sets, and there are definitely some that have curled maps due to being too big for the box.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

  

User avatar

Sage Collector
Valuation Board

Posts: 2867
Joined: Nov 16, 2002
Last Visit: Aug 06, 2026
Location: Ohio, The land without sun

Post Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 12:49 pm 
 

I'll chime in here as well.  Looking back through my numerous copies, here are some of my observations:

Folio maps are larger.  High quality maps.  Seem to have used a thicker paper stock and medium gloss.
Early boxed sets can have maps that are too big for the box.  Quality is similar to folio but paper stock does get thinner.
Boxed set maps have a range of gloss, mostly a higher level than folios.  Later boxed sets have smaller maps, some non-glossy.

Mars' posts pretty much sum it up, although I'm sure there will be some variation due to how the map printing runs were handled.

  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2589
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Last Visit: Mar 11, 2023
Location: Seattle, WA

Post Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:37 pm 
 

Mars had asked me to investigate this, but my collection was in storage.  Now that we're reunited, I'm slowly peeking into crates and pulling some items to answer some research questions.

I have a 1st print folio and it matches Mars' description.  I have a 1st print box and it also matches Mars' description.  Which is good, as Mars is a nice fella, so why disagree with him?   :P


Areas of interest/knowledge: Harn, WFRP, Ars Magica, anything BRP based such as CoC, Runequest, Pendragon and all their related games

  
Previous
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 2 of 21, 2