benjoshua wrote:Too cumbersome and fragile.But back to Keith's dilemma of what to collect....Keith, you may want to think about why you are collecting. I apologize in advance for questioning motives, but hopefully you won't mind taking a step back. It's also very possible you already considered all this, so please forgive the assuming.I personally collect stuff I like to read and use. However, I must admit that as I discovered the joy of the hunt, the thrill of the bargain, and the satisfaction of completing collections, it was hard to break out of that pattern. I'm not saying that I've stopped buying or collecting, but I have backed off purchasing things regularly. I now have enough stuff that I can read and play for years and not have to repeat myself. My walk-in closet is also full, so that was a reality check. :oops: All that being said, you do whatever you want. I'm just trying to help. 8)
Keith the Thief wrote:Excellent question, actually. It happens to be the reason I started the thread.My collection is very inconsistent in quality and quantity.But rather than going through and making sure I finish off my <insert collection here>, I'd rather focus on something I enjoy collecting and also enjoy reading.I've always been a fan of monster manuals.Basically, I just think monsters are cool.However, I was curious what you guys have enjoyed collecting.The idea being that you might suggest something I'd really enjoy.Philosophically, I just have a collector's personality.I could actually say, honestly, that one of my hobbies is collecting.Collecting what?Whatever interests me. For example, I love atlases and history.So I collect historical and military atlases.And I like to organize what I collect.Especially small shiny objects. Ooooooo Does this make any sense?
benjoshua wrote:Oh yeah. It makes too much sense. I just like collecting too. It's interesting to me that even some animals like collecting, but I digress. I used to collect insects, then stamps, then coins, then Pokemon cards, then Mage Knight and all along a lot of that journey, I was collecting D&D stuff, including miniatures. Once I found eBay, I went hog wild because I was making a small amount of money each week, and then larger amounts of money.And then I decided to collect comic books. Oh my. They take up lots of space. Of course, I needed long boxes, boards, and new, shiny bags. I like shiny too. ;)All that being said, and to answer your question, I like modules. I have a complete set of Dungeon, and a set of Dungeon Crawl Classics up until they changed the way the cover looks, and I even have a bunch of the DCC new covers. One of the things I am working on collecting now are memories. I like being with my family and traveling. I've used more money now on memories than I have my collection. I am saving up to see the pyramids with my wife now, and I'm almost halfway there! 8) Good luck! :)
Keith the Thief wrote:The biggest part of my D&D collection is The Dragon magazine.I love how you can browse through the early issues and see the way the D&D game progressed. But alas, I overdid it, and now -- like your comic book collection -- I have tons of Dragon issues that I don't really want.
Keith the Thief wrote:So if you were going to choose one of the classic campaign settings to collect, what would you pick?* Greyhawk* Blackmoor* Planescape* Forgotten RealmsObviously there are many more, but these interest me.Thanks,Keith
bamajon1974 wrote:How about collecting all of them? Many PS items are quite expensive though. Was this campaign setting really that popular, were the accessories rare, was collecting this setting a fad, or some combination of the three?
bamajon1974 wrote:How about collecting all of them?
grodog wrote:Greyhawk, but of course!
formcritic wrote:I would say Greyhawk for setimental reasons. I would say Planescape for power gaming purposes. I would say Forgotten Realms if you prefer 2nd Edition, post-Gygax TSR (which strikes me as dang near disloyal) Blackmoor is sufficiently wierd if that's what you're looking for.
Keith the Thief wrote:I am leaning that way because ... ... of what Mark says: Sentimentality.
grodog wrote:FWIW, I think Greyhawk has a lot more than mere sentiment, but if you're looking for a generic fantasy world that's big enough to define however you want to, and to fit in any culture/history/module/campaign idea, then functionally there's not a lot of difference between GH and FR. If you're planning to try to build your campaigns using established canonical content, then TSR published quite a lot more FR materials than for GH, so there's more FR to collect if you want to follow all of the setting's "official" goings-on, and such.If, OTOH, you're just going to use the setting to hang your own campaigns on, you can easily get away with either GH or the FR using their respective core box sets and just the articles published in Dragon.
Keith the Thief wrote: Ravenloft (which I'm not sure I knew existed as a campaign).
Keith the Thief wrote:BTW, what does "power gaming" mean?