serleran wrote:*rages and calls his horde*
Doug Williams wrote:Think of it like wine. Would you rather have "good" wine or "fine" wine? Coming from a comic book collecting background, I tend to grade D&D collectables just like I would a comic book. BTW, "Excellent" is not a grade in the comic book world, although I see it occasionally in D&D grading.Poor = Complete CrapFair = CrapGood = Ok for a play or reading copyVery Good = Bottom end collectableFine = Nice looking copy, collectableVery Fine = Better than fine, not as good as Near MintNear Mint = This is what most brand new items should be gradedMint = Perfect, no flaws whatosever. Most brand new items are not Mint.SW = Covered in plastic wrap. May be a pile of crap when you unwrap it.
Doug Williams wrote:Would you rather have "good" wine or "fine" wine?
Traveller wrote:There was a discussion I was involved in on these very boards where the grading system was being discussed. I made it abundantly clear where I stood in that matter: these are books therefore they should be graded as books.viewtopic.php?t=1669&highlight=gradingMy stance on grading has not changed in the intervening five years.
gvaughn1 wrote:Hello - I'm looking at a module that is in VG condition on Noble Knight. Here is their definition:VG Very Good. Used. May have medium sized creases, scuff marks, very small stain, etc. Complete and very useable.Question: has anyone ordered a VG module from NK before? The description above sounds a little scary. I've heard excellent things in general about KN, but curious specifically if this will be a "decent, collectible quality item?"Or should I hold out for something in Fine/VF?
Doug Williams wrote:I'm glad to hear that. White Plume Mountain is a fun adventure. I remember playing it back in the '80s. My character got Blackrazor![ Image ]
Deogolf wrote:Love that illo!!
stratochamp wrote: these issues have been weighing heavily on my troubled brow.