dhunton wrote:We publish the Ultimate Unofficial Collector's Guide to D&D (usually, the UUCG). The Acaeum has been one of our many reference sources, and we have spent a lot of time lurking on the forums.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:While I do agree that simply taking pictures and data without asking is simply a bad idea at best, and outright stealing at worst... (I do not agree that Copyright violations are involved) .Still; I think many of you are missing the big picture here.For the statements below; I am putting past research nabbing aside.It looks to me like the Acaeum member (YES he/she IS a member here too) who made the original post in this thread IS asking for help from other more knowledgable Acaeum members on specific items for a book that will (I assume) list MANY main stream colectables and old school RPG items.Seems to me that is what this forum and this site are for.Am I way off base with that line of thinking?If I am way off base, then please educate me what this place really is for.Because if I am way of base, then I joined this forum as a member for the wrong reasons myself.I do not understand the anger at all.BTW: I sent a PM asking what OP wants to know about the Fighters Wheel... no response.Perhaps we have run OP off...
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Jason, I have never published anything that is copyrightable in that sense, but I have had copyright issues in Land Surveying before.Another firm was heading up a comercial construction project that we were also working on.As such they had need of our electronic files to use our data to make designs fit with our work.In order to gain accees to our electronic files they SIGNED an agreement with our company NOT to change any of our electronic files or release them or copies of them to any other parties.They changed several things on a drawing and not only released it to another party (The city developement committee) but SIGNED the drawing as if it was their work and yet they also had the stupidity to keep MY RPLS Seal and our companies logo on the drawing.THEN THEY Filed it as if it was still OUR companies work to the City.Thankfully, I had great contacts and friends at the time and one of them called me to ask about it.That company is no longer in business.Though that instance was only a small portion of why.Yes, I can understand why such a thing would rip yer gut out.And I agree they screwed the pooch on this one by the methods they uesed and by not asking first.Asking first would have changed EVERYTHING.THAT is one of my main points Jason.This time... now... THEY ARE ASKING...Or were...
FormCritic wrote:As long as the courtesy of attributions and the requirements of footnoting are followed, there should be few real objections.
dhunton wrote:We publish the Ultimate Unofficial Collector's Guide to D&D (usually, the UUCG).