throwi wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year:... and 9 bids on those dice? wow.~throwi
Invincible Overlord wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year:throwi wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year:... and 9 bids on those dice? wow.~throwiSomeone with a one (1) bid is running up the other guy...
Serian wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year: ** expired/removed eBay auction **A 4th printing goes for $460 these days? Holy crap!
Serian wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year: ** expired/removed eBay auction **$56 (at the time of this post) for JUST A SET OF USED/WORN DICE ?!?!?
Gnat the Beggar wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year:Serian wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year: ** expired/removed eBay auction **A 4th printing goes for $460 these days? Holy crap!Well that listing did also include an early Greyhawk - Supp 1 and an early Blackmoor - Supp 2.If those supplements were both first prints then that price is not at all out of the realm of viable IMO.However; it was missing the reference sheets.
JasonZavoda wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year:CoC prices seem on the rise but this is truly wishful thinking.
SimperingToad wrote in Old Candidates: Silliest Auction Prices of the Year:It wasn't sold when I posted.One thought that occurred to me: The seller and buyer reached an accord off-auction. The seller lists it at an outrageous price so no one snags the BIN, then the buyer 'offers' a pre-agreed sum, and presto, sale is made.Just a thought anyway.