FormCritic wrote:I think they look OK.I don't like the white lower quarter with the red seal. I think the brown would be good for the entire cover.Can we get them to tell us in advance if the books are drab and stitched or glossy and explodo-glued?
MetamorphosisSigma wrote:They'll be glossy and glued. Telling ourselves anything different would be willful self-delusion.
bbarsh wrote:I am ok with the covers. Nothing really exciting. I do not like the fact that "Advaced" is missing from the PHB. It might be petty on my part, but it just jumped out qt me. Stay on target, stay on target...still buying...
From today's Upcoming Products seminar at D&DXP: Any plans to rerelease the other products for 1E and 2E and other editions, either in print or electronically? We are looking at making a lot of that older material available to you, but we want to make sure we do it right for you guys and for Wizards. We'll have more news on that.
Zenopus wrote:http://greyhawkgrognard.blogspot.com/20 ... happy.html
Keith the Thief wrote:I am ambivalent, or as a drunk frat brother used to say, amphibious.The D&D fan base appears to be hopelessly fractured. It'd be easier to reunite Christianity under the Pope.Does this make you want to become a regular WoTC customer? An old-schooler might buy a re-release of White Plume off-the-shelf simply because it's such a good module.Or a collector might buy it if it were a limited print run.But this isn't "Monopoly".There is no core D&D game anymore.For this gamer/collector, that seems to be the main problem.
Keith the Thief wrote:I am ambivalent, or as a drunk frat brother used to say, amphibious.
The D&D fan base appears to be hopelessly fractured. It'd be easier to reunite Christianity under the Pope.
Does this make you want to become a regular WoTC customer?
An old-schooler might buy a re-release of White Plume off-the-shelf simply because it's such a good module.Or a collector might buy it if it were a limited print run.
But this isn't "Monopoly".
There is no core D&D game anymore.
MetamorphosisSigma wrote:Doesn't mean there can't be again.
Keith the Thief wrote:I don't mind things changing, but why the hell would anybody mess with Monopoly??
Kingofpain89 wrote:You live in this country and you actually have to ask that? Most kids nowadays are used to electronic banking. Most of them dont carry cash or checks because they have ATM or credit cards. Odds are most of them couldnt tell the difference between a one dollar bill and a one hundred dollar bill. So instead of keeping track of their own money and making change in Monopoly like we did, they have the game do it for them. Oh and of course it makes it so much harder to cheat.Hell, I'm surprised they havent changed out the original Monopoly game pieces yet. Instead of a goofy looking toy race car, they should use a Ferrari or Bugatti mold. :roll:
ExTSR wrote:I find it very interesting that many retailers are first becoming aware of the 1e reprint from the fans, instead of from WotC. (This has already been documented.)What seems to have begun with a tentative feeler acknowledging reality (old school popularity) has escalated unexpectedly.otoh the ROI involved will not be enough to seriously interest Hasbro.F
Badmike wrote:My local gamestore doesn't have a clue, and won't be carrying the reprints when I brought it up. They don't see the business expense of buying older/retroclone games when they could be promoting newer stuff.Mike B.
darkseraphim wrote:From what I understand, the reason for "Advanced" not being in the title is so that the edition wars aren't brought to the forefront once again ...
darkseraphim wrote:So D&D 5E, with a base rule set somewhat similar to Castles & Crusades, will have lots of add-on attachments as supplements: Battlesystem-style large-scale, miniatures book, feats, subraces, the ever-present splatbooks etc.
darkseraphim wrote:And it may well just be called "Dungeons and Dragons."