MetamorphosisSigma wrote:Maybe if we keep our idiots away from this thread as well, the level of discourse will improve...
Mars wrote:Yep, nothing like a few trolling comments to turn the path of this one - its been so productive so far
Traveller wrote:Hey! I resemble that remark.
MetamorphosisSigma wrote:I had forgotten that some people are permitted to be abusive and stupid here, while others are expected to keep their opinions to themselves. Crimsonspire and jchriddy have responded to my complaint. We've all had our say in response. Move on.
Traveller wrote:In a nutshell Mars, no serious collector should ever shop Troll & Toad because they do not put the customer first.
Jchriddy wrote:It's fairly clear that most of you have made up your mind so it is pointless to try and convince you that we are making progress, but we are and will continue to do so as long as we have constructive input.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Here is a suggestion...When you advertise something for sale, and you give a description of it's completeness and condition, why not post the name, phone number and e-mail address of the person describing the product's condition and their manager's contact details aswell? You have already demonstrated that your company and staff take no responsibility for the accuracy of what you tell people in order to close a sale. And many of us here have had personal experience of what yu describe as 'customer service' and the staff that deal with that.Why not begin the change by making people take personal responsibility for their actions? I know it's draconian, but if you personally are not willing to put your neck on the line as to the honesty of your staff and their quality of their work, how can you expect ANYONE who hasen't ever seen your product to believe you?If you make the staff member known, and their contact details and their manager's name, it need only last six mnths, but at least the staff member knows he is personally responsible for his work, and his manager knows he will be contacted personally for every product he signs off on or fails to check.As regards your comment about change, your company keeps saying the same old stuff, and either the same staff have done FA about it over the past four years, or the job is so dificult they have to keep replacing the idiots who can't do it with other people hoping they might one day find someone honest and reliable and with a passion for their job.
FormCritic wrote:I think we're about finished here.Lock!
okgamer wrote:Just in case you don't remember me, I posted about a year ago when I took over the rpgs, since then, I've brought on Jcriddy, and Crimsonspire who both have done a tremendous job so far.
okgamer wrote:Pictures: Nothing will happen with these until there is a website redesign that is slated somewhere in 2011, but knowing programmers it might be 2012
okgamer wrote:Grading: Grading is improving, that is what I promised last year when I took the job, and Crimsonspire, and JCriddy have been actively working on it.
okgamer wrote:Ideas we are implementing: Any RPG item we are selling over $500, will have an individualized description. Jcriddy has ordered out everything that falls within that category, they should be back up by the weekend, pictures might take a couple of days after that.
okgamer wrote:We are getting cards to add into our reshrinked items to make it clear that they've been reshrinked. This should happen within 3 weeks, and at that point any shrinked item will include a visible card.
okgamer wrote:Communication: Both Crimsonspire, and Jcriddy will be here checking forums on a regular basis. If you have issues with an order and customer service isn't helping you let us know, and we'll try to fix it.
okgamer wrote:Shipping: We have two managers currently working with IT to figure out how to offer alternate shipping methods. We expect to offer more selections in the future, but as it is an IT product timelines are tough to nail down.
FormCritic wrote:Turns out you were right, ashmire.
mbassoc2003 wrote:So, items valued under $500 do not warrant the time or effort for an individual description and some good old fashioned honesty, integrity and clarity about what some muppet is buying? Surely setting the bar at $50 is a more honest way of doing business and ensuring customers aren't ripped off or treated unfairly?
ashmire13 wrote:That's a first.. Can you kindly let my wife know?
bombadil wrote:Unnecessary. The $500 minimum value threshold should cover just about anything D&D related that T&T sells, like 6th Print Players Handbooks, a beat-up copy of EX1, a shrunk-in-store copy of B2 with the maps colored in...