Plaag wrote:What's freaky is the Packers lead in net points by a good margin. Both them and Chicago have similar remaining schedules, so it may just come down to the last game of the year between them.ShaneG.
Badmike wrote:Bears are really my surprise team of the year. I had high hopes for them last year with the acquisition of Cutler, 2nd year of Forte, turning Hester into a WR, etc. They majorly underachieved, however, and the Cutler for Orten trade off with the Broncos looked like a bad deal. This year has really been much more of what I expected than last year, I was just a year off. The key has been their DEF which has really stepped it up this season.Mike B.
JohnGaunt wrote:Any takers for Tom Brady? He's been sitting on waivers since December 9.
Badmike wrote:I picked him up so he can sit his pretty boy ass on my bench for the playoffs and watch a real man (Phil Rivers) QB.....Mike B.
mdr003 wrote:Regarding Tom Brady - just curious about the waiver order this week. I had a request in for Brady, and it didn't go through - the Block Wipes picked him up. The message I got was that Brady went to anoher team who had a higher waiver authority.Can someone explain how the waiver priority works? I could understand it if Brady was picked up by someone below me on the table... but the Wipes are in first place.I'd much rather have him starting on my team than on the Wipes' bench...RegardsMike
Badmike wrote:I think it has a lot to do with the frequency of pickups, but i've never quite figured it out myself. I hadn't picked anyone up in several weeks so somehow my priority got bumped up. All kidding aside I'll probably start Brady for the playoffs....Rivers is starting to have a tough time with no running game and all his WR's injured. Mike B.